Euro 2024: Tepid England Draw with Denmark

England’s second group game of Euro 2024 was held against Denmark in Frankfurt on June 20. Thanks to the draw between Slovenia and Serbia earlier in the day, England would win Group C and qualify for the knockout stages if they beat Denmark. The stadium atmosphere at kickoff was wonderful, with both sets of fans in full voice during their respective national anthems. Denmark are widely regarded as the second best team in this group in terms of talent, with some truly top class players such as midfielder Christian Eriksen, striker Rasmus Højlund, defender Andreas Christensen, and goalkeeper Kasper Schmeichel. England would need to be at or near their best to make sure all three points were taken.

And for the first 20 minutes or so, England looked very strong. Aside from an early and rather tame shot straight at England keeper Jordan Pickford, England dominated the possession and chance creation. Midfielder Phil Foden appeared to be in better form than his previous match, and he created a good chance for himself with some neat dribbling before misfiring on his shot.

England took the lead on 18 minutes after a Danish defensive error. Their left back was lazy in chasing down a loose ball, and he failed to see England right back Kyle Walker blazing towards him over his right shoulder. Walker stole the ball off the defender, then dribbled it into the box. He put a cutback cross in towards winger Bukayo Saka, but the ball took a few deflections before falling straight to the feet of striker Harry Kane. Kane was only about 6 yards out, and he tapped the ball home with the inside of his left foot like he was at home in his garden. Great bit of effort from Walker to set it up, and the Three Lions got a little bit of luck with the deflections in the box. 1-0 to England!

But once England had the lead, something very predictable and very annoying happened. England began to sit back in defense and let the Danes have the ball. They were content to sit back and break up attacks, while reticent to go forward in search of game-killing goal. This has been a hallmark of manager Gareth Southgate’s tenure, and it’s been especially apparent at this tournament. That’s how they continued to play as the half wore on, and it was downright boring to watch.

As was foreseeable, England were punished for their conservative approach on 34 minutes when Denmark midfielder Morten Hjulmand lashed home a low and powerful shot from long range. England had lost the ball in a dangerous area, and suddenly Denmark had men in numbers near the box. No one stepped up to close down Hjulmand, and his finish from 20 yards or so beat Pickford at his far post, rattling in off the inside of the post. The Danish fans erupted in cheers while England could only look on. The shot was truly exquisite, but England fans felt like the equalizer could have been avoided with more aggressive attacking play. The half finished 1-1, with Denmark the happier of the two sides.

The second half was even more tepid than the first half. Foden was trying to make things happen, but no one else around him was really doing anything. Denmark still had plenty of the ball, and there were spells where they looked more likely to score than England did. Midfielder Jude Bellingham was anonymous, Kane went missing after his goal, and England were incredibly passive when in possession. They even lost possession numerous times in dangerous areas, and had to be bailed out by yet another strong defensive performance from center backs Marc Guehi and John Stones.

The match ended 1-1, with both sides only creating half chances sporadically as the match fizzled out. There were some nervy moments for England whenever Denmark won a corner, but the points were shared at the end of the match. England remained top of Group C on 4 points, but missed out on clinching the group and moving on to the knockouts. A victory over Slovenia in the final group game guarantees progression. A draw may also do it if Denmark draws with or loses to Serbia.

England were bad in this match. No two ways about it. Outside the first 20 minutes, it was a terrible performance. There are several issues with the current set up of this team from a tactical perspective, and Southgate is to blame for not fixing them when they became apparent in the last match against Serbia. For starters, it seems that he has to choose between Foden and Bellingham. They both shine in the attacking midfield, but they are not as good when played elsewhere. Foden was good today, but Bellingham was not. Bellingham was good against Serbia, but Foden was not. Southgate has to make a choice there. I suggest dropping Foden for a natural left winger in Anthony Gordon, then bring on Foden for Bellingham late in the match if need be. I understand the level of Foden’s talent and that he would start on almost any team he played for, but for England he has to take a backseat to Bellingham. This team is unbalanced, and the Foden/Bellingham issue is a big reason why.

I also don’t know why Southgate insists on playing Trent Alexander-Arnold in midfield when that is clearly not his best position. He plays right back for his club, although he is much more like a traditional right winger given his talents in passing and crossing. For whatever reason though, Southgate thinks he should play as a defensive midfielder next to Declan Rice. There’s just no other way to explain it – he just simply isn’t meant to play there. He also needs to be benched, with either Conor Gallagher or Kobbie Mainoo starting ahead of him.

Perhaps the biggest issue though is the style of play. Not only is it conservative, right now its uncoordinated as well. There were multiple instances where Pickford and his back line were not on the same page in terms of ball distribution. Pickford clearly wanted to play it long, but players like Walker and Rice were frequently directing him to play it short to a nearby defender. Pickford just ignored them, tried to play it long into a sea of red shirts, and Denmark would inevitably end up with the ball again. England would get stuck in their own half for minutes on end because Southgate is insisting on style of play that his players are not accustomed to. Our players have a ton of experience at building from the back and establishing possession that way, and Southgate must employ a style that suits them.

I get that England are still in a good position to get out of the group. It’s not really the results that are the problem. The problem is that England are simply better than this, and we have a manager who is failing to get the most out of his players. He puts square pegs into round holes all over the pitch, then doesn’t let them play attacking football anymore after scoring the first goal. It’s one of the most frustrating things I’ve ever seen. We can easily score 3 or 4 goals against almost anyone! I am imploring anyone within shouting distance of Southgate to tell him to let these lads play!

My biggest fear is that all this criticizing is in vain. Southgate is likely going to continue playing this way. Hopefully he at least changes the team selection for the Slovenia match, but he is virtually guaranteed to play conservative again if England take the lead. Many are calling for the Football Association to sack Southgate mid-tournament, but that isn’t likely to happen either. What is for sure is that Southgate has a lot he needs to figure out, and he needs to figure it out quickly. Even though England are likely to get out of the group, the opposition in the knockout rounds will be much tougher. It’ll be another lost tournament for England if they can’t figure out their tactics and best line-up. Slovenia on Tuesday at noon PDT in Cologne!

Three Lions on the Shirts!

World Cup Roundup – Groups C and D

Qatar is a socially backwards country but FIFA doesn’t care because they have money. There is nothing FIFA loves more than money.

Group D

Winners – France

Runners Up – Australia

Eliminated – Tunisia, Denmark

The French knew they were already through to the next round, so manager Didier Deschamps changed up his team significantly for this final group match against Tunisia. France are so deep in talent though that starting some bench players doesn’t necessarily mean a big drop off in quality for them. Tunisia needed a win from this match and then for the Denmark/Australia match to go their way as well. Even against a rotated side, Tunisia were still heavy underdogs.

But all credit to Tunisia for going out and earning themselves a famous 1-0 victory. France defended well in this match generally, but were rather toothless going forward until it was already late on in the match. Tunisian attacking midfielder Wahbi Khazri got what was ultimately the winner on 58 minutes, after he went on a long run with the ball in the center of the park. France did not get a challenge in until he was already in a position to shoot, and although his effort was rather tame it fooled France keeper Steve Mandanda just enough. It rolled over the line and the Tunisians were ecstatic.

Make no mistake – France were outplayed today. Tunisia were the ones playing the ball forward the most and had the most attacking intent. Les Bleus did have an Antoine Griezmann goal ruled out for offside late on, but that was their deadliest attack. France will need to be better in the Round of 16, especially going forward.

Tunisia did their part to advance, but needed a draw between Australia and Denmark to secure progression. After their final whistle blew, the Tunisians flocked to video monitors to see the final few minutes of the other match.


Australia/Denmark was a much more intense affair, probably because both sides were fighting for their World Cup survival instead of just the one. Both sides really went for the winning goal, but it was Australia that came away with the surprising, maybe even shocking, 1-0 victory.

Denmark were the better side for the opening 45 minutes, as they created most of the chances. Aussie keeper Matthew Ryan made 2-3 fine saves to stop them, and on other occasions his defenders made a last-ditch tackle to help him out. They improved and started creating half-chances of their own in the second half, and it was on the hour mark that they finally got their breakthrough. They recovered the ball in their own final third, and it was eventually collected by attacking midfielder Riley McGree. He spotted striker Matthew Leckie in front of him making a run between two defenders. He played the ball to Leckie, who brought it forward while being closely marked by a single Danish defender. Leckie was allowed to carry the ball into shooting distance, and after some nifty dribbling he got a low shot away from just inside the Danish box that nutmegged his marker and beat Danish keeper Kasper Schmeichel at the far corner. It was a well-worked counter-attack that could go down as one of the most famous goals in Australian history.

The Danish had more possession after that and tried to find a winner, but their finishing was truly woeful. Headers going wide or high every single time. Well done to Australia for holding on, but Denmark were just as poor today as they have been the whole tournament. A team with that level of quality in it should not be struggling as much as they are. They had a lot of injuries pre-tournament and several of the players were rusty as a result, but that’s not really an excuse. Against Australia and Tunisia at least, the Danish should be winning. Very toothless in attack for all three of their matches.

But Australia’s famous win sees them through to the knockouts for the first time since 2006. They can defend well and got just enough offense to progress. The win wasn’t without drama though. Had Leckie not scored and the match ended 0-0, it would have been Tunisia going through instead. Well done to the north Africans for getting a famous victory as well, but it wasn’t enough to secure progression. If such a thing as a “bittersweet victory” exists, this one for Tunisia was one of them.

Group C

Winners – Argentina

Runners Up – Poland

Eliminated – Mexico, Saudi Arabia

There was even more drama in this group than there was in Group D! Argentina beat Poland 2-0 today thanks to goals from midfielder Alexis Mac Allister and striker Julian Alvarez. Poland were in this match until the Mac Allister goal just after half time, as keeper Wojciech Szczęsny had saved a penalty from Lionel Messi on 39 minutes. The Poles were struggling in attack, but Szczęsny did well to make the save and keep his team in it for a little while longer. Poland looked rather toothless today, but I think that’s because psychologically they knew they were in a good place to advance, even with a loss. They went through today as runners’ up, but they will need to play much better in attack to have any chance at winning their next match. Credit to Argentina for improving over the past two games and getting the results needed to win their group. Their defense in particular has looked much stronger.

———————————-

The high drama was in the Mexico vs. Saudi Arabia match. The Mexicans were desperate for a victory, and needed not only to win but to do so by several goals to overtake Poland on goal difference. Saudi Arabia knew that a draw might be enough for them to go through, but realistically they needed to win to guarantee progression.

Mexico were the better team in this match, although it was 0-0 at halftime again. Carlos Vega had the best chance early on, although his effort after being through on goal was snuffed out by Saudi keeper Mohammad Alowais. The Mexicans kept their impetus though and found the back of the net (for the first time at this World Cup) just after halftime thanks to a header from forward Henry Martín. 1-0 wasn’t enough though, as they needed at least two more to overcome the goal difference tiebreaker. They either needed to score themselves or hope that Argentina could get a third against Poland. The Mexicans got their second however just 6 minutes later from a thunderous free kick from midfielder Luis Chavez. This was another Goal of the Tournament candidate, given that he was almost 30 yards out and still placed it into the top corner. World-class strike!

For the next 30-35 minutes or so, Poland and Mexico were level on points, goal differential, and goals scored. The final tiebreaker kept Poland ahead though, and much to my surprise that tiebreaker was/is yellow card accumulation. Poland had two fewer yellow cards at that point, so they were placed ahead of Mexico in the standings. That rule needs to be changed. Instead of punishing teams that are playing aggressively, why not have shots on target be the final tiebreaker? The rules of the game should be set up to reward attacking football, after all.

Ultimately however the yellow card tiebreaker did not matter, as the Saudis got a goal back in stoppage time from attacking midfielder Salem Al-Dawsari. That was a hammer blow to Mexico, as it largely ruined their chances of overcoming their negative goal difference. Mexico had the ball in the back of the net twice after they got their second, but each was called back for offside. The second decision was correct, but Hirving Lozano’s run and shot just a few minutes after the second goal was a much closer call. In all reality, it was too little too late for El Tri.

I think Mexico’s fate at this World Cup was sealed before a ball was even kicked though. There was no call up for Javier Hernandez or Carlos Vela by manager Tata Martino, and it was clear that Martino would be fired once Mexico’s World Cup run ended due to his contract situation. Martino is positively reviled by the Mexican media, and I can’t say as I blame them. His failures here are numerous. He did not call up two of Mexico’s best players, and no one seems to know why. He did not set up his team to win with his tactics, and he did not make the right substitutions when needed. Mexico have a fair amount of talent, but they need play in a tactical system that suits them. They did not do that until the second half of today’s match, when it was far too late to start doing so. If this is the last World Cup for legendary keeper Guillermo “Memo” Ochoa, it is a rather lackluster way to go out.

The Saudis got off to a fantastic start in this tournament, and their upset of Argentina in the opening group game is probably the most famous one in their history. They did not do enough in the other two group games, and were particularly poor today against Mexico. They can take pride in their improvement, but they ultimately will need more talent to make a deep run at any World Cup going forward.

Argentina vs. Australia – Saturday December 3 at 11 am PST

France vs. Poland – Sunday December 4 at 7 am PST

United Draw With Leicester / World Cup 2022 Groups

Manchester United returned to action this past weekend in the Premier League, hosting Leicester City at Old Trafford. United knew that only a victory would keep them in the race for the top-4 and Champions League football next season. Unfortunately, due to illnesses and injury, neither Cristiano Ronaldo nor Edinson Cavani were available for selection. Manager Ralf Rangnick thusly elected to play without a traditional striker, deploying Bruno Fernandes as a “false-9”. There was some controversy among some pundits for choosing this particular approach when Marcus Rashford was available for selection. Rashford has not been in good form this season though, so Rangnick was kind of damned either way.

The tactic didn’t really work though. Bruno was torn between dropping back into midfield to get on the ball and getting forward to get on the end of crosses. He can’t do both. Rashford was brought on in the second half, but he did not make much of an impact either way. He was robbed of a good chance in stoppage time when Anthony Elanga mysteriously got in his way while Rashford was attempting to shoot. No coordination or communication at all there. The match finished 1-1 with United probably having the better of the chances, but it was only thanks to VAR that they did not lose this match 2-1. Leicester scored first but United got an equalizer four minutes later via Fred after Leicester keeper Kasper Schmeichel could only parry away a shot from Fernandes directly into his path. But for the most part, the false-9 strategy did not work. United looked toothless in attack for most of the match. They defended well (mostly) and were able to put together some good combination passes in midfield (sometimes), but the production in the final third of the field was sorely wanting.

United have a lot of problems to sort out this summer. Our midfielders are not consistently good enough. Both of our best strikers are on the wrong side of 30. The defense plays well enough at times but they still allow roughly one goal per game. When your strikers aren’t scoring, allowing a goal a game is a recipe for draws and defeats. Rangnick said post-match that the players lack physicality and tenacity, and while that is a mind-boggling concept at the professional level it’s hard to argue against him. Supposedly Dutch manager Erik Ten Hag will be brought in this summer and he could indeed get things back on track to a degree, but the problems at this club are bigger than one manager. The players are overpaid and unmotivated, and ownership has no aspiration or ambition beyond making the top-4. Old Trafford needs renovations, and the club’s training ground at Carrington needs revitalization as well. The Glazers have neglected this club for the past 17 years and must be held accountable for their poor stewardship. They need to either sell the club or give over majority ownership to the fans. We will not consistently challenge for trophies as long as the Glazers remain in charge.

***

In more optimistic news, the draw for World Cup 2022 has taken place and England find themselves in Group B along with the Americans and Iran. They will also play one of either Scotland, Ukraine, or Wales. That has not been fully determined yet due to the war in Ukraine delaying their fixture with Scotland. Wales plays the winner of Scotland/Ukraine for the final spot in the group.

Iran on opening night of the tournament will be a challenging fixture most likely, as they always seem to give bigger teams trouble when the spotlights are on. Scotland/Wales/Ukraine will also be tough no matter who ends up qualifying. Scotland and Wales both despise England and will be highly motivated to get a result, and if it’s Ukraine then the entire world will be cheering for them to do well. England are used to being the villains at this point, but it would be especially tough to play against a country that almost everyone in the world feels sorry for right now.

But the mouth-watering fixture is on Black Friday 2022 against the Americans. I was rubbing my hands together in anticipation when I saw the potential for England and USA to be drawn in the same group. I’ll do a much more in-depth preview of the match once it gets closer, but I am beyond excited for this one. The Americans held England to a draw in the group stage of World Cup 2010, and they beat us outright back in the 1950s. England are in very good form right now though, and I am not sold on just how good the Americans are right now. They have talent in attack to be sure, but their midfield and defense are not as consistent.

Some other intriguing match-ups in the group stage:
Argentina vs. Mexico

Argentina vs. Poland (Messi vs. Lewandowski)

Spain vs. Germany

France vs. Denmark

Portugal vs. Uruguay

More to come on World Cup 2022 as it gets closer!

Euro 2020(1) – England vs. Italy – Final Preview

Location: Wembley Stadium, London, UK

Date/Time: Sunday July 11, 2021 – Noon PDT, 3 pm EDT, 8 pm BST

Network: ESPN for Americans (unfortunate as ESPN has been sub-par with their coverage for me)

Now that we have the basics out of the way, let’s dive into this epic match and try to glean some sense of what could happen. I am happy that this is the final matchup, as Italy an England have been inarguably the two best teams this tournament. Both are defensively very sturdy and both have a generous amount of attacking talent as well. England have conceded only one goal so far this tournament, and the Italians have only conceded three. Italy has had England’s number at tournaments in recent years, knocking us out in 2012 and beating us in the World Cup group stage in 2014. England will be looking to buck that trend and win their first major trophy in 55 years. Italy have won the Euros before but not recently, with their best result in the last 20 years or so coming in 2012 when they lost in the final to Spain.

I think that overall this is going to be a very tense match and I don’t anticipate a lot of goals being scored. The final match of a major tournament is almost always a very defensive affair anyway, and that will continue this time around due to the defensive structure of both teams. Both teams are built on not losing first and foremost. I think both managers Gareth Southgate and Roberto Mancini would be happy sacrificing some attacking play if it means there is more security in front of their respective nets.

Italy

This squad is talented and has a very deep bench. Italy will be the toughest team that England has played so far this tournament, but that’s how tournament football is supposed to be played. It is not supposed to be easier as it goes along. That being said, while this Italian team is very good, they are not invincible. There are ways to get at them.

I have spent some time in the past few days looking at portions of replays from Italy’s matches so far this tournament, and the main thing I noticed is that this team punishes mistakes. If you misplace a pass or spend too long on the ball, Italy will be on you and looking to win the ball. Several of their goals in the group stage and in the knockouts came from simply being opportunistic and jumping on other teams when they spent too much inside their own half. They hunt the ball like a frenzied sharks who can smell blood. I think they will spend at least some time pressing England if/when we decide to try and play it out from the back.

But that’s not the only way they can win. Like any good side, this Italy team can beat you in a number of different ways. They have also looked incredibly proficient on the counter-attack when needed, and they can also do the traditional possession-based tactics when looking to break down a stubborn defense. Marco Veratti is the traditional midfield “general” who has that magic ability to find the right pass at the right time. Under Mancini that possession-based approach has dwindled somewhat though, as he seems to favor more aggressive and direct tactics. Their match against Spain proved that they are capable of winning without a lot of possession. Typically, when on the ball, Italy are doing their best to run at you. When off the ball, they are doing their damnedest to get the ball back. Mancini’s deft application of the 4-3-3 allows Italy to be aggressive in that manner and the 4-3-3 is expected again from them tomorrow.

Winger/forwards Lorenzo Insigne and Federico Chiesa are going to be the main goal scoring threats for Italy tomorrow. Insigne has dazzled at the tournament with his dribbling, and he scored an absolute stunner that ended up being the winner against Belgium. He cannot be allowed any space on the edge of the box, as he is capable of scoring from distance or finding a deadly pass that unlocks the defense. That goes for every Italian forward or midfielder, as they can all shoot from the edge of the box. Much like Raheem Sterling, Insigne’s runs at defense tends to pull defenders out of position, which creates openings for other attackers (usually from midfield) to run into. I do not know if England will double mark him, but it should at least be considered.

Chiesa is slightly different in that he is not really known for long bursts of pace and dribbling. Unlike Insigne, he is not going to run 40 yards with the ball and then try to get a shot off. Where Chiesa excels is in tight spaces at short distances with the ball at his feet. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a player with his ability to get shots off from seemingly-impossible angles and create a goal from nothing. His goal against Spain was just such a goal. He spent a few seconds in the Spanish box wriggling and turning around, so much so that you thought the chance for a goal was gone. But his coordination and balance are such that he was able to get a shot off with not a lot net to aim at, and he still found the far corner. He also cannot be allowed to operate undeterred on the right side of the Italian attack. If he and Insigne are finding time and space on the ball, it’s going to be a long night for England.

The Italians also have the size to be dangerous from set pieces, but they also have conceded from a set piece too. Austria’s only goal against them was a simple header from a corner. They were just switched off at the back and the first Austrian player the ball came to simply headed it down and low. I don’t think the Italians will be that switched off again on Sunday, but all it takes is a moment of carelessness. You can expect stalwart center backs Leonardo Bonucci and Giorgio Chiellini to make a big impact from set pieces, whether it be attacking or defending. Those two have been rock-solid this tournament at the back and they will again be charged with organizing everything in defense.

The absence of left back Leonardo Spinazzola will once again be sorely missed for Italy. He was having an electrifying tournament before succumbing to an ACL tear, and in several of their matches he was the main attacking threat. His combination play with Insigne was borderline unstoppable at times, and while Emerson has been a solid deputy in his absence, Emerson’s decision making in the box leaves a lot to be desired. He can dribble and cross like Spinazzola, but he doesn’t always know when to do one versus the other. England’s right back and right winger will be happy that Spinazzola will not be playing.

Unmentioned Notable Players: Manuel Locatelli, Nicolo Barella, and (Olympic gold medalist in diving) Ciro Immobile

England

Southgate deployed England in a 4-2-3-1 against Denmark, which was perhaps a tad conservative but obviously nonetheless effective. Aside from a 20 or so minute spell in the first half, Denmark had little attacking play and did not create many chances. The best thing about the Denmark match from a tactical perspective was England’s response to going a goal down. Up until the semifinal England had not been behind in the entire tournament, but very importantly they were only down for a grand total of 9 minutes before equalizing. I wanted to see how this team would respond to going a goal down, and I am happy we don’t have to run that experiment against the Italians. When they have a lead, they rarely give it up.

I think the 4-2-3-1 will be used again in an effort to neutralize the midfield against Italy. Declan Rice will be charged with getting himself in the middle of the passing lanes, and if I was Southgate I would utilize Kalvin Phillips to man-mark Veratti. Spain provided somewhat of a blueprint on how to slow down Italy, and a big part of it was using Koke to constantly harass and harangue Veratti so that he has no time on the ball. When he as time to play a pass, he can hurt you. When he doesn’t, he becomes largely anonymous and ineffective. Phillips looked a little leggy at times against Denmark, but I think he will find some success in sticking to Veratti. He is a tenacious midfielder and is proficient at closing down the player on the ball. If we make Veratti consistently pass it backwards, that is a victory.

In attack, I think almost everything is going to go through Sterling and Harry Kane. Those two are on fire for England right now and in excellent form. Actually, Sterling only plays well after I insult him repeatedly, so I am going to get that out of the way now. Sterling makes poor decisions, he loses the ball too much, and he can’t consistently finish to save his life. Now that I’ve said that, he’ll go and score a hat-trick just to prove me wrong.

There is a degree of mystery as to who will play on the right wing for England, and also who will be in the “number 10” attacking midfield role behind Kane. As for the right wing, both Bukayo Saka and Jadon Sancho have had good tournaments playing there. Saka created England’s first goal against Denmark and Sancho was a key player in the win over Ukraine. Both offer pace, dribbling, and attacking intent. Whoever is played, they need to be eager to make diagonal runs between the left back and left center back. I’d generally like to see England’s forwards making runs in behind and also being quick to get the ball into the box. As good as Bonucci and Chiellini are, they have a combined age of 70 and as a result they are not fast players. We may not be able to out-position them or out-muscle them, but we can certainly out-pace them. For that reason, the counter-attack may be an effective tool against them as well.

Kane’s role in attack will also be interesting. He’s a natural goal-scorer of course, but against Denmark he was also the principle playmaker. Mason Mount was the designated number 10 attacking mid against Denmark, but Kane was in his spot so often it seemed like Mount was playing a different position. Kane has been known to drop back off the forward line into the space in front of the center backs when he plays for Tottenham, and because he can shoot from distance the center backs are required to run out at him and close him down. This pulls the defenders out of position and makes it even easier for speedy wingers to get in behind. I expect Italy to deploy defensive midfielder Jorginho to try and keep Kane from receiving the ball, or at the least to prevent him from turning and running with it. Kane is deadly in the box of course, but it seems he is just as deadly with the ball at his feet and other attackers running ahead of him. I doubt he starts as the number 10 tomorrow but he will undoubtedly make his way to that position if he is not seeing enough of the ball.

Another tactic England should take from Spain’s playbook is using the press against Italy. It’s true they’re incredible at pressing others, but they looked a little shaky when Spain pressed them, particularly when Italy were trying to build from the back. Goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma is an excellent shot-stopper and he commands the penalty area well, but he looked shaky (at the least) when asked to hoof the ball up the pitch towards his forwards. Like many modern keepers, he likes to play short passes to his defenders which enables his team to build up attacks through possession more easily. Blasting the ball 60 yards gets it away from your goal, but it has the risk of being more easily collected by the opposition. That’s exactly what the Spanish made him do. When Donnarumma was on the ball, Spain’s forwards got right up on the defenders he would normally pass to. That made it too risky to pass to them, and left him with the option of clearing it long, which he did rather unconvincingly at times. I counted at least two average-to-good chances created that way for Spain. Hopefully England are more clinical in their finishing.

England rode their luck to a degree against Denmark, but you cannot rely on luck to win a final. Maybe you get some and hey it’s great when you do, but it cannot be relied upon. England will need to be very focused defensively and clinical when their opportunities to score arrive. It is almost certain that England will have at least 1-2 good chances to score, and they must take them. The Italians have proven to be very opportunistic this tournament, and England will have to be the same way. England themselves have been fairly mistake-free so far, one or two questionable clearances from keeper Jordan Pickford aside. We cannot afford to make a wary pass in midfield or under-hit a back pass from defense, because if we do the Italians will make us pay. England do not have to be perfect to win this match, but we do have to be damn well close to perfect.

Unmentioned Notable Players: Luke Shaw, Harry Maguire, Jack Grealish. Phil Foden is unfortunately a doubt to play after suffering a foot injury in training. He would be a loss, but not as big a loss as Spinazzola is for Italy.

Referee/Shithousery

Dutch referee Bjorn Kuipers will be holding the whistle tomorrow and he will have to be on his toes indeed. The referee should ideally be a non-factor in every match, but I have a feeling that he will be called into action repeatedly tomorrow. England won a penalty off a “dive” in their last match, while the Italians have spent generations perfecting the art of selling fouls to win free kicks/penalties. If the Italians get a lead in the second half they will certainly employ that element of gamesmanship to get them over the line. VAR will also have an influence on the match, even though ideally it should not. Prepare yourself for shithousery on a level never seen before and the resulting controversy, because it’s going to happen. There will be cries for a penalty if either team’s defense even so much as breathes on the attacking player.

Final Thoughts

Too close to call this one, and even if it wasn’t I still wouldn’t venture to guess. It seems that overall most neutrals are rooting for Italy, and for a wide variety of reasons. A lot of people didn’t like that England beat Denmark on a soft penalty, a lot of people think our supporters are arrogant, and some even go as far as to root against England due to its bloody colonial history. All of that is mostly nonsense. Denmark got at least two decisions in their favor against us, our supporters have no foundation to be arrogant given that we’ve won naff-all in 50+ years, and if you’re going to be mad at England’s colonialism you should also be pretty mad about Italy’s. My point is that all this hatred towards England is largely unfounded and frankly I don’t get it.

Two incidents I will not stand for however is the harassment of opposition fans/players on social media, and the use of a laser pointer on the face of Danish keeper Kasper Schmeichel in the run-up to Kane’s penalty. The first of those is immoral and the latter is outright dangerous. I want to win, but I don’t want to win because the fans are enabling cheating.

Everything else is fair game though. Boo the Italian national anthem. Sing songs about how they dive more frequently than submarines. Show them what true gamesmanship is by crying for fouls and waste time by rolling around on the ground. Take forever to do substitutions if we have the lead, etc. I don’t care anymore. You don’t beat Italy or win finals by being gentlemanly about the rules. It’s time to give them a taste of their own shithousing medicine. If the occasion calls for us to be villains, then villains we shall be.

Come on England!

Euro 2020(1) Semifinal Day 2 – England in a Major Tournament Final For the First Time Since 1966

What an absolutely historic day. It’s still sinking in for me, really. This is a new feeling and I don’t really know how to process it, to be honest.

There were no formation changes for England, although Bukayo Saka was preferred to Jadon Sancho on the right side of the attack. At this point, manager Gareth Southgate has earned the right to do basically whatever he wants with the team, so the criticisms pre-match were much quieter than normal. Denmark manager Kasper Hjulmand deployed his side in a 3-4-3, the lineup they have used for most of the tournament.

The match got underway in a warm-but-rapidly cooling Wembley and indeed it was England on the front foot for the first ten minutes or so. We were aggressive and went straight at them, which was exactly what needed to happen. Raheem Sterling almost turned in a deep cross from Harry Kane, but the ball was just too far ahead of him and England did not take advantage of their momentum. Denmark grew into the game and were soon the ones making all the runs themselves. England went from looking confident to looking moderately nervous, as I don’t think they expected the Danes to be so slick with their passing in attack.

Their possession in the England half paid off when a foul was given in favor of Denmark right around the half-hour mark. Midfield playmaker Mikkel Damsgaard hit a powerful but finessed shot over the wall of England defenders and just under the crossbar of Jordan Pickford’s goal. Pickford jumped up high to get it but his jump was a little late and the ball sailed over his right fist. It was a hell of a time for England to concede their first goal of the tournament, but it happened nevertheless. Pickford maybe could have done better to get a hand to it as the shot was closer to him than initially thought, but take nothing away from Damsgaard. It was a world-class strike and it could be argued that Denmark deserved their lead.

But England did not back down or crumble under pressure, and more on that later. They instead seemed somewhat galvanized by the opposition’s goal and soon created a gilt-edged chance for Sterling via a cross along the ground from Kane. Sterling was in good position on his defender but he hit his shot straight at the abdomen of Danish keeper Kasper Schmeichel. If Sterling had hit it literally anywhere else, it would have gone in. Good positioning from Schmeichel but you felt England should have been level.

Undeterred and unbothered, England carried on attacking and got the equalizer just a minute or two later via an own goal from Danish captain Simon Kjær. Kane had dropped into the midfield to receive the ball, and he spotted Saka on a great run in behind the Danish defense on the right wing. The ball reached Saka who dribbled the ball to the end line and crossed over from the right towards Sterling, who was crashing towards the net. Kjær was between the ball and Sterling, but the pace of the cross and the fact that he himself was sprinting towards the goal to keep up meant that he accidentally turned the ball into his own net with his sliding challenge. To say that Kjær was primarily at fault though would be harsh on him, since no one in the Danish defense bothered to track the initial run from Saka that created the goal. In semifinals it does not matter how they go in or who scores, as long as the ball goes in.

England were the better team from that point onwards. I felt we could have had a second before halftime if there had been any amount of stoppage time because we really had Denmark on the ropes. The whistle was their savior though, and England had to be content with being level at 1-1. The second half continued in the same way as the end of the first half, mostly England domination. Harry Maguire was booked however for an aerial challenge on Kjær, even though it didn’t really seem like the conduct rose to the level of a yellow. Maguire was trying to get position and he collided with Kjær on accident. It’s maybe a foul but certainly not a yellow. That would not be the last controversial decision from of the evening though from Dutch referee Danny Makkelie, and more on that later as well.

The Danes were the next to form a decent chance from a counter-attack that saw Pickford required to make a save from striker Kasper Dolberg’s low but powerful effort. Dolberg was later ruled to be offside when the ball was played to him, but it was a reminder of just how sneakily-talented the Danish forwards are. Maguire then had probably the best chance of the second half, when he rose in the air again and this time cleanly headed the ball down and towards the far corner of the Danish goal. Keeper Kasper Schmeichel dove down and was fortunate to get a hand to the ball and push it around the post. It was going in had Schmeichel not intervened.

Dolberg got another tame shot away at Pickford shortly after that, but England were then the ones to create a succession of half-chances, the best of which was a scuffed shot by midfielder Mason Mount that ended up being an easy save for Schmeichel. Mount also had a cross/shot tipped over the bar by Schmeichel.

England probably should have had a penalty on 73 minutes when Kane was clumsily tripped by a Danish defender just inside the box, but Makkelie had none of it, and indeed awarded Denmark a free kick the other way. He must have thought that Kane took a dive, but replays showed he was clearly tripped. A short VAR review confirmed the decision, even though England’s players and fans (who saw the replay on the big screen) clearly saw contact on Kane. The Maguire yellow was a poor decision, but this one was outright terrible.

The second half ended without further incident though, and extra time would be needed with the prospect of penalties looming large. England were on the front foot again from the outset, and the Danes were beginning to look rather tired indeed. Jack Grealish had been previously brought on for Saka, and the Danes had made a plethora of changes as well. Curiously, they took off Damsgaard and Dolberg. Perhaps they were fatigued, but I thought those two had been the two best Danish players on the pitch. They were creating problems for the England defense with their passing and movement, yet Hjulmand felt they needed to come off. As an England fan I was happy to see it, but the “analyst” in me didn’t understand it. It must be said that the subs, in particular striker Yussuf Poulsen, did not perform well after coming on. Poulsen has had a good tournament but he was sub-par after coming on today.

Kane forced a fine save from Schmeichel from a tight angle in the first few minutes of extra time, and England poured on the pressure from there. Grealish forced another save from Schmeichel, yet this one was relatively comfortable as it was straight at him. Sterling blazed over shortly after that.

Another suspect refereeing decision was made a few minutes after that, but this time it broke England’s way after they awarded a penalty for a foul on Sterling near the end line. Sterling had broken into the box and despite his poor finishing today he certainly caused a lot of concerns in the Danish defense with his dribbling. He can be maddening to watch at times for his decision making and shooting, yet other times he looks like one of the best forwards in the world. As for the foul itself I must admit it was soft. There was contact on Sterling and he went down after it, but the contact appeared to be fairly minimal and Sterling definitely made the most of it. VAR checked it though, and once again refused to overturn the Makkelie’s decision. I have seen those given, and I have seen those not given.

Kane stepped up to the spot and was given the signal to take the penalty after a long VAR review. After a short-ish run up he hit the ball low and to his right, and admittedly it was rather tame as well. Two separate nations held their breath as Schmeichel got low to make the save. Unfortunately for Schmeichel, he couldn’t fully secure the shot and the rebound fell straight to into the path of Kane. He struck it into the now-empty net with Schmeichel beaten and sent England into ecstasy. Kane scored our first extra time goal at a tournament (104th min) since 2004, and England knew they were firmly in the driver’s seat for the final. Kane now also has 10 goals at major tournaments, which equals former striker Gary Lineker’s record for England.

The Danes unfortunately lost a man to injury after that and because they had used all their substitutions they were forced to play with 10 men for the final 15 minutes, and you can tell they were just about spent. England switched to a back three, which I didn’t particularly care for because all of a sudden Denmark was seeing a lot more of the ball and you knew England would have to hold on a bit. All of a sudden we became the counter-attacking team, using our pace and fresher legs to get out rapidly and run at them. Sterling had an effort saved by Schmeichel from close range at a tight angle late on, and a few Danish corners came to nothing. The final whistle eventually blew and Wembley erupted into joy.

Yes, England rode their luck today to a degree, but there were plenty of unlucky things to happen to England as well. I understand that Danish fans feel particularly aggrieved about the penalty, as it does leave a sour taste in one’s mouth as being the reason that your team goes out. England were the better team for the majority of the match though, and there was no guarantee that Denmark wouldn’t concede given their fatigue and playing with 10 men for the final half of extra time. Sure they may have gotten it to penalties, but England could have also used more subs (Jadon Sancho, Marcus Rashford) and really caused the Danes even more problems. I think most neutrals would concede that the better team won today, even if the manner in which it was done feels kind of cheap. England don’t care though, and nor should they. First major final in 55 years, and our first ever European Championship Final. For those who don’t know, the Euros first started in 1958!

What is there to say about this team, other than the fact that they are amazing? Southgate once again got all his decisions right today, and the players did all their jobs to an exceptional degree. Kane in particular deserves some plaudits, having set up the first goal and scored the second one. Sterling also deserves credit for winning the penalty and tormenting the Danish defense all night. Lots of credit to the back line and defensive midfielders as well. Yes they conceded one, but it was a fairly stunning free kick and the Danes never really looked super threatening after that one or two half-chances aside.

I think what needs to be commended the most though is the team’s collective mentality, and it’s Southgate, his training staff, and the captain Kane that deserve credit for that. England were tested today by a talented and underrated side, having gone behind for the first time in the tournament after 30 minutes in the high-pressure cooker of a semifinal. But England didn’t play passively after conceding. They stepped up significantly and took a lot more risks, and it only took nine minutes to find the equalizer. It’s true the Danes defended mightily and Schmeichel should be commended for his virtuoso performance today, but England were the dominant team from the equalizer onwards. This team believes in themselves. They have the experience at the club level of playing in big matches, and that experience is translating well into the national side. There is no club tribalism, there are no cliques of players. Everyone gets on with everyone and they are mature enough to realize they are playing for something bigger than themselves.

England’s players went and celebrated with the fans as best as they could with COVID restrictions, and Wembley rang out in chorus’s of “Sweet Caroline” and the infamous “Three Lions (Its Coming Home)”. I hope they enjoy the night and enjoy this moment of history-making. However, the opportunity to make even more history beckons. Only one team stands between England and eternity now – Italy. The final is Sunday at noon (PDT) at Wembley, and England know it will not be an easy task. Full match preview to follow.

Come on England!!

Euro 2020(1) Semifinal Day 1 – Italy Edge Spain on Penalties, Plus England-Denmark Preview

I did pick Italy to win yesterday, but I did not think it would be as close as it was. Indeed, Spain did an excellent job today against the Italians in terms of disrupting their normal tactics, but Italy showed a real resiliency as the match wore on.

The first half was goalless but based on possession and chances created, you would say that Spain were the better side. They took a page out of Italy’s book and decided to incorporate more pressing into their normal possession-based tactics. Spain played the same as they always do when they were on the ball, which is to spring some passes together in midfield and eventually move the ball up to the edge of the box. They tried to work several openings free in the first half, with attacking midfielder Dani Olmo looking very lively. His dribbling and passing was causing the Italians problems, but they always managed to get a final block in.

The most notable aspect of their press though was when they went at Italy goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma. He normally likes to play it short to one of his defenders when it comes to clearing the ball or taking a goal kick, but he could not do that today due to Spain’s forwards playing tight to the defenders. That forced Donnarumma into longer passes up the pitch, something he clearly was not comfortable doing today. Spain fashioned several half-chances using this method of pressing, but while they did not score this also prevented Italy from growing into the game and creating their own chances.

I have to say that in the first half, the epic battle in the midfield was won by Spain. Sergio Busquets and Pedri were dominating the middle, and Spain manager Luis Enrique deployed midfielder Koke (CO-kay) to man- mark Italian midfield general Marco Veratti. When Veratti is allowed time on the ball he can play some devastating passes to his teammates, but with Koke constantly harassing him, he never really found time on the ball to makes those passes. The same could be said for Italy’s defensive midfielder Jorginho. When he was on the ball, Busquets and others were always on him quickly so he could not find an outlet pass. This resulted in Spain winning possession much more frequently than Italy would have liked.

Despite Spain being the better team, the Italians went ahead on the hour mark after a now-familiar error in the Spanish defense. Italy hit them on a counter-attack, and a slick backheel from striker Ciro Immobile found Federico Chiesa on the left-sided edge of the penalty box. Spain didn’t have many men back and failed to clear the pass. Chiesa launched a shot at goal, and it found the top corner of the net. The positioning of the defenders and the angle of the shot did not give Chiesa a lot to aim for, but he put the ball probably in the one place it stood a chance of going in. Misery for Spain as they had been the better team. With a 1-0 lead fairly late on in the game, I figured the Italians would shithouse the rest of the match and escape with the win.

All credit to Spain though, as they kept fighting and created several good chances in an effort to equalize. Mikel Oyarzabal was guilty of missing a gilt-edged chance when he missed making contact with a cross by a matter of centimeters. Spain were rewarded for their efforts though 20 minutes later when Olmo found himself in a good position with the ball on the edge of the Italian penalty box. He played a lovely 1-2 with substitute striker Alvaro Morata, who exorcised some of his earlier tournament demons by finishing along the ground from close range. No chance for Donnarumma, and we had ourselves a semifinal.

There weren’t many further chances in normal time, and it ended 1-1 after 90 minutes. The same pattern of play continued in extra time, with Spain probably being the better of the two sides but stalwart Italian defending kept them out. It was just incredibly crowded in the box every time Spain got close, and that made it very difficult to have time for a shot. Italy sometimes broke out and attempted to hit Spain on the counter, but some tired legs and timely challenges from Spain kept it 1-1. Penalties were needed.

Football is such a fickle sport, and penalties are the most fickle part. Both sides missed their first respective penalty, with Olmo and substitute Manuel Locatelli both missing. That would be the last penalty the Italians would miss though. It stayed tied until Morata stepped up on the 3rd penalty for Spain and hit a rather tame effort low and to Donnarumma’s left. Donnarumma made the correct choice with his dive, and he saved Morata’s effort. Jorginho then took the decisive fourth penalty, and he showed some real ice in his veins by calmly sending Spain keeper Unai Simon the wrong way with his shot. The Italians stormed the field having won, and Spain were left to wonder what could have been.

Commiserations to Spain. They were the better team on the day, but Italy has been the best team this tournament. Italy showed an ability to adapt today that only elite-level teams have. They completely changed their usual tactics and still managed to execute the game plan almost to perfection. That’s very difficult to do in the middle of a tournament. They deserve a lot of credit, with manager Roberto Mancini deserving in particular. You have to feel also that a lack of finishing, both today and throughout the tournament, was a major problem for the Spanish. Morata did well to finish his chance, but they had several other opportunities to score today that they did not cash-in on. I do hope that the idiots on social media do not blame Morata for this loss. It’s not on him, at least not solely. Yes he should have done better with his penalty, but this is a team sport. Spain could have helped him out a lot more today by scoring other chances, and had they done so penalties might not have even been necessary.

Italy will play in the Euro 2020(1) final at Wembley next Sunday, July 11. They await the winner of England/Denmark. Whoever they play, it will be very difficult to beat them. They don’t quit, they have a lot of talent, and they know how to manage different scenarios well.

England vs. Denmark – Preview

Noon (PDT) at Wembley tomorrow. 60,000 fans are expected to fill Wembley to 3/4 capacity and the atmosphere should be electric.

Denmark

Denmark came into the semis as the lowest-ranked remaining team, but they don’t care about that. Not at all. England have played against more talented teams this tournament, but I am not sure we have played a team quite like Denmark so far. That is not to say they are without talent – indeed they have players who ply their trades in the top divisions across Europe, including the Premier League. What I mean is that this is a team that truly believes it is a team of destiny, and it’s hard to argue against that point. Yes they lost their two opening group games, but they have shown a resilience and team spirit in this tournament that vastly makes up for their lack of superstar talent. This is a team on a “Cinderella run” in every sense of the phrase. They are playing for Christian Eriksen, and that kind of motivation is impossible to duplicate. Denmark actually won the Euros back in 1992 and they were a “Cinderella” team back then as well, but they haven’t really come close to winning it again since then. This is the most unified and determined team left at this tournament, and that unity and determination gives them a strong sense of confidence in themselves.

It could be argued that the Danes have had an “easy” path so far, seeing off Wales in the Round of 16 and then the Czech Republic in the quarterfinals. That take is slightly disrespectful to those two other countries, but when you consider that the Swiss had to beat France and England had to beat Germany, you get the sense that the draw has been kinder to them than to other teams. The last time the Danes lost was to Belgium in the group stage, a team with an actual degree of quality about them. Yes the Danes scored first but they conceded two after that as they were not capable of dealing with the technical abilities of Kevin De Bruyne. Sometimes, an overwhelming amount of talent is really the only thing that can beat a stubborn defensive unit.

The Danes do have some talented attacking players, and I think tomorrow they will use their speedier players to try and break out quickly and hit England on the counter-attack. I don’t think they have the talent in midfield to hold possession against England for long spells, so the counter and opportunities from set pieces will be key. They scored four in a knockout match earlier this tournament in the Round of 16 against Wales, so they are capable of getting goals when they need to.

Players to Watch: Youseff Poulsen, Mikkel Damsgaard, Joakim Mæhle, Kasper Dolberg, Simon Kjær, Kasper Schmeichel 

Side note on Schmeichel: he is a Premier League winning goalkeeper with Leicester City and is the son of one of the greatest goalkeepers of all time: Peter Schmeichel. It was Peter who helped the Danes to glory in 1992, and now his son is trying to do the same thing! It’s a great story, and while Kasper is probably not quite as good as his father, he definitely has the ability to morph into a brick wall on a given day. Harry Maguire and probably a few other England players will be fully aware of his talents, having played both with and against him. Kasper perhaps was a tad braggadocios today by making jokes about the phrase “it’s coming home” in his media interview, and I hope England players saw that. People in the media or online coming with banter is one thing, but it’s completely different when an opposition player is saying something. Perhaps could serve as a motivation to England’s forwards. Speaking of!

England

England, both the team and that nation, are positively rocking right now. The match against Ukraine was the best I have seen this team play in a tournament probably ever. We hadn’t scored 4 goals in a tournament knockout match since 1966, and we will have a distinct home advantage at Wembley. 95+% of the fans in attendance will be supporting England, and I expect every single one of them to be in full throat for all 90 minutes.

Given that the best way to beat Denmark appears to be to overwhelm them with attacking talent, I suggest England does that very thing. Manager Gareth Southgate doesn’t need to change the lineup much or if at all, as the most important thing will be an aggressive approach. The entire game plan can be summed up in one two words: aggression, ruthlessness. We need to come out and be ruthless from the get-go, and if we can score another early goal it will get us a long way to the final. The longer it stays 0-0, the more confident Denmark will feel. We need to be on the ball, dribbling with the ball, and making forward runs. When we are not on the ball, I would like to see England constantly haranguing the Danes and trying to win the ball high up the pitch. No matter who is on the pitch for us, they need to be playing with unrelenting aggression and ruthlessness. Even if the Danes can withstand it for the first 45 minutes, they will eventually tire. Once again, you can expect England’s depth of talent on the bench to factor in heavily if things are not going our way.

Denmark’s defense has been “good enough” this whole tournament. They’re doing enough to win matches, but I do not think Denmark will be able to keep England at bay for 90 minutes. They have conceded at least 1 goal in every match they’ve played in so far except for one. England were dangerous from both set pieces and open play in the match against Ukraine, and we have proven to be exceptionally efficient at crossing the ball over the top. Most of our goals this tournament have come from crosses over the top. The wingers and full backs, in particular Luke Shaw, have been nothing short of incredible.

We are the first team in the history of the Euros not to concede a goal in their first five matches. Jordan Pickford looks locked to win the Golden Gloves for fewest goals conceded. The back line communicates well with each other and we have the athleticism at the back to keep up with anyone. As good as we are at heading the ball in for goals, we are equally as good at heading them away from goal when defending. Denmark’s best chances for a goal will probably come from set pieces, so alertness and concentration will be vital when those inevitably happen.

This match is England’s to lose. Having said that, it would be very English of us to come this far and do this well only to falter in the semis. I must say though, it feels different this time. I hope that line doesn’t come back to bit me in the ass, but it really does. The draw has been somewhat kind to us as well after beating Germany, and we must take advantage. The stars will not align like this for England again.

Players to Watch: Harry Kane, Raheem Sterling, Jadon Sancho, Shaw, Jack Grealish, Phil Foden, Marcus Rashford, Mason Mount

No prediction because of course not, I’m not stupid.

Euro 2020(1) – Quarterfinals Day 2 – Danish Delight and England Dominance!

The second matchday of quarterfinals saw Denmark take on Czech Republic in Baku, Azerbaijan while England were drawn against Ukraine in Rome, Italy in the night fixture.

Once again, this post is primarily going to be about England. I will not apologize.

Denmark vs. Czech Republic

I won’t dwell on this too much but I must note that I hated the location this match was played in. Azerbaijan isn’t even in Europe geographically but because the country paid UEFA a lot of money and has loose COVID restrictions, they got to host a European Championships quarterfinal. Never mind the extra travel for the teams, a poor atmosphere for fans, or the warmer temperatures; there’s money to be made! Greedy bastards.

As for the match itself, Denmark controlled the first half by a considerable margin and are still clearly playing like a team possessed. They have some talent in their side but what’s really pushing them through is the desire to play well for Christian Eriksen, their still-sidelined teammate that gave the world quite a scare when he collapsed on the pitch in the opening match.

Denmark scored from a corner in the opening 5 minutes when defensive midfielder Thomas Delaney found himself unmarked and headed past Czech goalkeeper Tomas Vaclik from about 14 yards out. The header was a low bouncer with power on it that look easy to stop for a keeper but I can assure you they are probably among the hardest shots to stop. The rest of the half was the Czechs trying to keep possession and the Danes hitting them on the counter attack. They looked dangerous every time the ball broke their way, and the Danes also did well to win it high up the pitch and create chances that way. The Danes second was a real work of art, primarily the final pass from left back Joakim Mæhle. He hit an absolutely delicious cross with the outside of his right foot into the box, which was inch-perfect for striker Kasper Dolberg to redirect into the back of the net with his shin. Good technique on the finish from Dolberg to be sure, but the pass from Mæhle might be the assist of the tournament. It is so hard to cross the ball accurately while running, and even harder to do it with the outside of your foot. It was truly sublime and the Danes were in cruise control going into the break.

The Czechs tapped the brakes on the Danes though and firmly took them out of cruise control when Patrik Schick added to his impressive tally this tournament when he redirected a cross past Danish keeper Kasper Schmeichel. It was early in the half and it was precisely what the Czechs needed to get back into the match. But all that fluidity and endeavor shown by the Czechs evaporated after the goal. The Danes collected themselves a bit and started possessing the ball more, and for the remaining 40 minutes or so both sides really only fashioned a few half-chances at most. Stoic defending from the Danes, and a lack of creativity from the Czechs. Perhaps fatigue was a factor in the heat of Baku.

Denmark won 2-1 and advanced to their first Euro semifinal since 1992. Truly a remarkable achievement and they deserve all the cred it for it. They await the winner of England/Ukraine.

England vs. Ukraine

Much like the aforementioned Danes, Czechs, and the Swiss yesterday, Ukraine are a team that plays better than the sum of their parts. They only have 2-3 standout players, but they have a strong sense of unity and they seem to really enjoy playing spoiler against bigger teams. I do think the Ukrainians have the ability to score via players like winger Oleksandr Zinchenko and midfielder Andriy Yarmolenko, so they will need to be contained by the English defense. I think there are questions about the Ukrainian defense though, and I want to see England use our forwards to run at them and create openings at the back. I think Raheem Sterling will once again heavily feature, as it was his dribbling that led to a goal against Germany. I’d like to see him on the right wing though, instead of on the left, though. Seems more effective from the right.

England interestingly reverted to a 4-2-3-1, a big change from the 3-4-3 they used to beat Germany. Jadon Sancho finally got the start England fans have been clamoring for, but Jack Grealish was curiously absent from the starting lineup. Its clear that manager Gareth Southgate likes to use him as an impact substitute. There was also a start in midfield for Mason Mount, who also started the first match against Croatia but hasn’t featured since due to a positive COVID test. The lineup was still somewhat conservative, but so far that approach has worked for England, even if it isn’t the most entertaining. I (and many others) want to criticize the approach from Southgate more, but he’s bought himself some room to operate in with the win over Germany. Our bench is much deeper than Ukraine’s anyway, so I expected some key substitutions to be made if things weren’t going our way. Sterling started on the left wing again, so Southgate didn’t listen to me on that one.

But he should not listen to me at all, because England came out and scored in the 4th minute after a delightful pass from Sterling (who was on the left, lol) found a run from Kane into the penalty box. He beat Ukrainian keeper Heorhiy Bushchan to the loose ball and toe-poked it up and over his outstretched leg. Great pass, great run, great finish. Sometimes it really is that simple. It was a nightmare start for Ukraine but an absolute dream for Kane and England.

England created a few more good chances in the first half, notably from Declan Rice and Harry Maguire, but failed to score them. Ukraine grew into the game a little bit and had a good spell of possession later on, but failed to create a real grade-A chance. There were just one or two poor giveaways in midfield by England and keeper Jordan Pickford was required to make a decent save at his near post from Ukrainian striker Roman Yaremchuk. It was a save he should make every time, but it was still moderately concerning that he had to make such a save.

England went into halftime 1-0 up though, despite cooling off a little after the red hot start. I was generally pleased, but I wanted a second goal fairly early on to really kill off the match. Ukraine were starting to believe in themselves a little as the half wore on and I wanted that optimism smothered as soon as possible. I got exactly what I wanted 2 minutes in when Kane won a free kick in the left channel for England. Manchester United’s Luke Shaw stepped up to take the free kick, and he found the massive head of club teammate Maguire at the far post. Maguire headed the pass back across the keeper and into the opposite corner for 2-0. A goal crafted on the Carrington training ground in Manchester! An absolutely thumping header too!

England were probably home and dry after that, but they didn’t take their foot off the gas pedal at all. If anything, they pressed down harder. A scant four minutes later, Mount brought the ball forward from midfield and played it to Sterling. Sterling was closed off by defenders but that created space for Shaw, who was on an overlapping run behind him. Sterling backheeled it to Shaw who knocked in another lovely cross with a first time hit, and he hit Kane straight in the forehead with it. Kane nodded the ball down and through the legs of Bushchan for 3-0. It was a close range finish for Kane but he still did very well to get the ball down with enough power to get it through the keeper’s legs. I had to pinch myself at 3-0 because it didn’t feel real.

Kane went close to a third goal and a fourth for England just after the hour mark with a very sweet hit on the volley, but he had to settle for a fine save from Bushchan. The angle and distance of the shot truly would have been a spectacular goal, but again the keeper was equal to it. The resulting corner was the source of England’s 4th goal, though. Mount took the corner as four English players flashed down towards the goal, and the first man to it was defensive midfielder and substitute Jordan Henderson. He got clean contact on it after losing his man and it was a simple redirection of the pass into the far corner after that. Poor marking from a probably now-jaded Ukraine and the keeper had no chance. Well done to Henderson for getting his first ever England goal! The quarterfinal of a major tournament is a great time to get it.

4-0 after 63 minutes. I couldn’t believe it. Completely blown away by the performance and there was still almost half an hour left. The only thing to ensure now was the maintaining of the clean sheet. England have not conceded a goal at Euro 2020(1) yet and the professional thing to do would be to keep it that way. Pickford’s first truly challenging save of the match was in the 74th minute when the ball fell to Ukrainian defender Yevhenii Makarenko, who struck the ball with power towards the goal. Pickford got his hands up to parry it away, but it was an awkward save from fierce strike. One or two more half chances were created by both sides after that, but all the real action was done. Ukraine were spent physically and mentally towards the end and England didn’t really press in attack any further. A lot of substitutions were made late on in the second half as well by Southgate in order to protect the players on yellow cards from suspension. Kane was also taken off to a standing ovation from England fans in attendance at Stadio Olimpico in Rome.

As someone who has been watching England for over 20 years, I can tell you that England have not traditionally made it look this easy. This was dominance in a tournament I haven’t seem from this team since…ever? Sure, we usually beat minnow teams like Andorra or San Marino 4-0, 5-0, etc., but those are usually qualifiers or friendlies that aren’t nearly as important as games like this one. Put bluntly, ever since 1966 England have been choke artists. Choking in the big moments with a level of consistency that should not be physically possible. Always had loads of talent, almost always had a half-decent manager, but we could just never put it all together when it mattered most. That happened today though. England looked like a well-oiled machine for most of the match, and we ran the opposition ragged. It’s a very unfamiliar experience for England fans, but a nonetheless positive one.

It is true that Ukraine didn’t play well, and that they are not the most talented opposition England have faced so far, but they set up with a back 5 from the outset of the match and were clearly intent on defending well as a unit and then hitting on the counter. But England blew that plan to pieces with the early goal from Kane. Completely shattered them for the next 20 minutes after that. Then, just when they were starting to recover and grow into the game a a little, we destroyed them again with the early goal in the 2nd half from Maguire. It was over at 2-0, and England just poured it on from there. It was ruthless, and I loved it.

Respect to the Ukrainian players and manager/legend Andriy Shevchenko, but England were just better today through and through. Of course, this was only a quarterfinal and the tournament is not over. England now advance to only the third Euro semifinal in their history and the first one since 1996. Also of note is that this is now three semifinals in a row for England – World Cup 2018, Nations League 2019, and now Euro 2020(1). They will play Denmark at Wembley Stadium in London next Wednesday. I will do a separate preview of that massive fixture and the other semifinal between Spain and Italy beforehand.

Semifinals are set! One of these four remaining teams will win Euro 2020(1)! All remaining matches are at Wembley!

Italy vs. Spain (July 6, noon PDT)

England vs. Denmark (July 7, noon PDT)

Congratulations to Leicester City, 2020/2021 FA Cup Winners!

After a long single elimination tournament, today it was finally time to crown the winner of the Football Association Cup, more commonly known as the FA Cup. Leicester City and Chelsea travelled from their respective homes to Wembley Stadium, a neutral site and England’s national stadium. The FA Cup is special for a variety of reasons, mainly because it involves every club side in the 8 divisions of the English football pyramid. From the Premier League at the top all the way down to Northern Premier League Division One in the 8th tier, everyone gets to play in this tournament. As I’ve mentioned before on this blog, it’s a bit like the March Madness of England. Sometimes small clubs made up of semi-professionals can win a few games in a row and find themselves playing against the likes of United, Manchester City, Liverpool, etc. Imagine going to an office all week and then suiting up to play a team of millionaire, world-class players at the weekend! It’s a wonderful tournament and the FA Cup is regarded as the 2nd most important domestic trophy, behind the Premier League title.

A tactical analysis will not be the focus of this post. The first half was boring but the second half was very entertaining, and that’s really the long and short of it. Leicester City’s Youri Tielemans hit an absolute screamer from 25 yards for what was ultimately the winning goal, but Chelsea had a late equalizer ruled out for offside in the buildup by VAR. It was white-knuckled at the end there but Leicester held on to win the FA Cup for the first time in their 137 year history. Honorable mention to goalkeeper Kasper Schmeichel for a dominant performance in the Leicester goal today as well.

I think the main focus of this post should be more focused on what this match meant not only to Leicester and Chelsea fans, but also to fans across England, Europe, and perhaps even the world.

Even though most people are not supporters of Leicester City, there were probably few people rooting for them today, Chelsea fans aside of course. Leicester have the reputation of a club that is “doing it right” in terms of the traditions of English football, and as a result many people will support them if they aren’t playing against their preferred club. They are “doing it right” in the sense that they don’t rely on massive signings of big players to be successful. They do not usually spend massive amounts of money in the transfer market, unlike the more traditional powerhouse clubs of the league. They are experts at finding talent in the lower divisions of football and developing them into stars, they develop their academy players well, and they have won two major trophies in the past 5 years while doing so. They also look likely to finish in the top-4 and therefore play in the Champions League next season. They have been managed well by their ownership and fully deserve a reward such as this.

England and Europe need to take note of this result as it is a massive counter-argument against the European Super League and the idea that the “big 6” or “top 6” clubs even exist. The idea that only United, City, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, and Tottenham are allowed to be considered as the “best” clubs is simply no longer true. The likes of Leicester, Everton, and West Ham are proving that this season. There is more parity in the top division than there has been in quite a long time, and it’s a wonderful thing for the English game.

Leicester, as a club, are also massive and very convincing argument against the formation of the ESL. If the ESL were to have happened, Leicester would have been locked out despite having a better season than Arsenal, Tottenham, Liverpool, and arguably even Chelsea. That would discredit the validity of the ESL in terms of the level of competition, as a very good team would have no way of getting into it. All because they don’t have as big of a revenue stream as the others. It would have been a crime.

Lastly, I think the result of this match pales in importance to the fact that this was the first match in over a year where a significant number of fans were permitted to attend. 22,000 mostly-masked supporters were permitted inside Wembley Stadium and the atmosphere was positively electric. United legend Sir Matt Busby once said that football is nothing without the fans, and the lockdowns due to the pandemic have proven him to be a thousand percent correct. This match was incalculably better than any I have watched in over a year, simply down to the presence of supporters losing their mind over a goal. Fake crowd noise simply does not cut it. The sight of Leicester forward Jamie Vardy orchestrating some crowd noise while Leicester was defending their lead gave me goose bumps. I also enjoyed the booing of former Leicester left back Ben Chilwell every time he touched the ball. The fans give the game a bit of vibrancy and dramatically increase the entertainment value overall.

I understand that the pandemic is not over by a long shot and that many parts of the world are still suffering its effects, but today was a magical day at Wembley for Leicester, English football, and for anyone seeking a degree of normalcy and respite from these trying times.

A Very Tense Final Day Sees United Finish 3rd and Qualify for the Champions League!

Lots of action across England today as the Premier League wrapped up it’s season with the 38th and final round of matches. Thanks to the stoppage in play due to COVID-19, this season has lasted almost a calendar year. It’s been very long and very bizarre to see matches played in empty stadiums, but in the end it’s better than no football at all.

If you read my preview post, you know that the top-4, the Europa League spots, and the relegation battle still needed to be fully decided. Manchester United knew coming in to their match away to Leicester City at the King Power Stadium that only a draw was needed to assure qualification for the Champions League next season.

The game got off to a now-typical slow start for the Red Devils, and such as many matches before this one, it was Leicester who had more of the opening possession. United looked fairly disjointed the final third for much of the first half, but they did indeed look very solid at the back. Harry Maguire picked up a yellow card early on but did very well to stay out of trouble for the rest of the match while still defending very capably. Leicester also left their shooting boots at home to a certain extent, with striker Demarai Gray guilty of wasting 1-2 good chances. Marcus Rashford was unlucky to score after a good save from keeper Kasper Schmeichel around the 40th minute or so. At halftime it was 0-0 and despite some nervy moments, United were 45 minutes from the Champions League.

Leicester kept attacking us though, and former England striker Jamie “Chat Shit Get Banged” Vardy glanced a header up into the air from an awkward angle, and it was lucky for United that he only found the top of the cross bar where it met the far post. Leicester were finally unlocked though in the 67th minute when Bruno Fernandes, who had been slightly below average up to that point, played an excellent through ball to Anthony Martial on a run towards the Leicester goal. Martial took a few touches before being sliced down by Leicester and former United defender Jonny Evans in the box. It was a clear penalty and there were really no complaints from the Northern Irish center-back after Martin Atkinson pointed to the spot. Bruno, the current designated penalty-taker, stepped up and in his unusual-but-effective style, sent Schmeichel the wrong way and put United ahead with 20 minutes to go.

With one foot in the Champions League and Leicester now needing two goals to qualify, it would have been easy for them to feel dejected. They kept pressing though, and both Vardy and center-back Wes Morgan had chances to equalize. Vardy couldn’t get enough on his shot though and it was an easy save from David De Gea, while Morgan missed the ball altogether despite being unmarked and in a dangerous position. Gray also fizzed the ball just wide again.

Late on in the match, United substitute Scott McTominay had the ball around the edge of the area when he was fouled rather recklessly by Evans. The ref correctly showed Evans a straight red card with little hesitation, and Leicester were down to 10 men for the final 5 minutes or so plus injury time. They were trying their best, but United’s defense was too resolute and it was actually United who got the next goal to see the points and in the process seal 3rd place. Substitute Jesse Lingard (of all people) got his first Premier League goal of the season in the 98th minute when he pressed Schmeichel on the ball and won it off of him. The ball went slightly wide when Lingard took the ball but he easily collected it and slotted it home into the empty net. I don’t expect Lingard to be back next season, and if so this was a wonderful good-bye for him.

Points sealed, despite it being somewhat ugly. Champions League: mission accomplished! It is a testament to the managerial skills of Ole Gunnar Solskjaer that this team was 14 points off Leicester in fourth place in February and have now finished 4 points ahead of them in 3rd. The first half of the season was incredibly inconsistent thanks to injuries and poor tactics, but OGS and his staff completely turned us around. We have won the most points out of any other club since January, and while some of it can be attributed to the COVID break that allowed players to return from injury, you really have to attribute much of our success to Bruno. He was the signing of the season by far and he really helped this team click. 10 goals and 8 assists since he joined us in January from Sporting Lisbon, but its not just the incredible stats that he brings. He brings confidence to the team. Swagger, if you will. United teams of the past have always played with confidence and swagger, and it’s nice to see them finally doing that again. He was probably Man of the Match today for his contributions in the final 20 minutes, despite not having his best game. That’s what we mean when we say “world class” though; when a player has the quality to go and win a game at any moment despite not playing well.

Very happy with the finish to this season and the 3rd place result. No tricky playoff match now to qualify – we are straight into the group stages. If we can add some depth in the transfer window at winger and defensive midfielder, I’ll be very happy. I’ll do a whole season review of the Prem soon as now there is no club football until August when the Champions League and Europa League resume. This post though is purely for celebration, and I hope the players are able to celebrate tonight too (within reason of course).

United’s next match is now not until August 5th against LASK at Old Trafford, which gives the players a nice 10 day rest that is fully deserved. Everyone can relax a little and not have to worry about playing a match every 4 days. We are also already up 5-0 on aggregate against LASK, so maybe some youth players will get a run out then as well.

See you in the Champions League next season!